← Back to static site-generators tools

Compare Static Site Generators

Side-by-side comparison of static site generators

Choose tools to Compare

As

Main Features:

  • Built-in Optimizations
  • Content Collections
  • Framework Agnostic
  • Islands Architecture
  • Zero JS by Default

Supported Languages:

JavaScript, TypeScript

Supported Templates/Mark Ups:

.astro components, Markdown, MDX

Toolchains:

Vite, Rollup, esbuild

Top Pros:

  • Excellent default website performance.
  • Framework-agnostic component architecture.
  • Simple and intuitive syntax.
  • Fast build and development.
  • Great documentation and DX.

Key Cons:

  • Young ecosystem
  • fewer plugins.
  • SSR capabilities still developing.
  • Client-side component configuration.
Visit Astro
El

Main Features:

  • Incremental Builds
  • JavaScript-centric
  • Plugin Ecosystem
  • Simplicity and Flexibility
  • Template Language Support

Supported Languages:

JavaScript

Supported Templates/Mark Ups:

HTML, Markdown, JavaScript, Liquid, Nunjucks +6 more

Toolchains:

Vite, Rollup, Webpack +2 more

Top Pros:

  • Simple and easy to use
  • Highly flexible configuration options
  • Excellent performance and speed
  • Good documentation for getting started
  • Growing and active community

Key Cons:

  • Configuration can become complex
  • Plugin quality can vary
  • Learning curve for beginners
Visit Eleventy